<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No sympathy for the Duchess of discontent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefemspot.com/2008/10/11/no-sympathy-for-the-duchess-of-discontent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefemspot.com/2008/10/11/no-sympathy-for-the-duchess-of-discontent/</link>
	<description>Feminism isn't dead; it is immortal!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 01:18:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not My World &#124; pink&#9733;star</title>
		<link>http://thefemspot.com/2008/10/11/no-sympathy-for-the-duchess-of-discontent/#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Not My World &#124; pink&#9733;star]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://femspotter.wordpress.com/?p=220#comment-438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the &#8216;net for a similar opinion on the movie and almost gave up when I came across Femspotter. Her review of The Duchess said everything I wanted to, if only I knew the words. Read her review (you will not be [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the &#8216;net for a similar opinion on the movie and almost gave up when I came across Femspotter. Her review of The Duchess said everything I wanted to, if only I knew the words. Read her review (you will not be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: femspotter</title>
		<link>http://thefemspot.com/2008/10/11/no-sympathy-for-the-duchess-of-discontent/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[femspotter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://femspotter.wordpress.com/?p=220#comment-74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for your points. I don&#039;t agree. I really loved the film aside from what I discussed in my post. And I think the film does show her wit and intelligence. I think her interactions with the politicians demonstrate that she can converse and joke with the boys; and I think they respect her. I like her speech about freedom as absolutism. I like when she tells the Duke that women wear elaborate clothes as a means of self expression and he looks at her like he didn&#039;t expect there to be thoughts inside her head. I admire her compassion for Charlotte, the illegitimate child who comes to live with them. I agree with you that Fiennes is terrific. As you point out, it would have been easy to let that character be a flat villain. My objection to the Dargis review is that it trivializes some of the more grotesque things Georgiana must endure. If she weren’t such a respected critic, I might think she didn’t see the entire film.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your points. I don&#8217;t agree. I really loved the film aside from what I discussed in my post. And I think the film does show her wit and intelligence. I think her interactions with the politicians demonstrate that she can converse and joke with the boys; and I think they respect her. I like her speech about freedom as absolutism. I like when she tells the Duke that women wear elaborate clothes as a means of self expression and he looks at her like he didn&#8217;t expect there to be thoughts inside her head. I admire her compassion for Charlotte, the illegitimate child who comes to live with them. I agree with you that Fiennes is terrific. As you point out, it would have been easy to let that character be a flat villain. My objection to the Dargis review is that it trivializes some of the more grotesque things Georgiana must endure. If she weren’t such a respected critic, I might think she didn’t see the entire film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gaiusc</title>
		<link>http://thefemspot.com/2008/10/11/no-sympathy-for-the-duchess-of-discontent/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gaiusc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://femspotter.wordpress.com/?p=220#comment-73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Maybe she isn’t a feminist. What bothers me about her review of the film is her unsympathetic assessment of this intelligent, passionate and ultimately compassionate woman of an earlier era.&quot;

I don&#039;t disagree with you that she was an intelligent woman in an impossible position but that&#039;s not what the film shows. The film needs to be examined on it&#039;s own merits as well as dis-merits. Those are:
-A really weak performance from Dominic Cooper. It dragged the entire movie down.
-A spirited performance from Knightly but her character is ultimately unsympathetic. Cavorting and living the party-going life makes her look like an earlier version of Paris Hilton, rather than a genuine mould breaker.
-Beautiful sets.
-An excellent performance from Fiennes. It would have been all too easy to depict the Duke as a cartoon villian but his nuanced performance added depth.
-Poor script. Some of the lines were desperately clunky.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Maybe she isn’t a feminist. What bothers me about her review of the film is her unsympathetic assessment of this intelligent, passionate and ultimately compassionate woman of an earlier era.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t disagree with you that she was an intelligent woman in an impossible position but that&#8217;s not what the film shows. The film needs to be examined on it&#8217;s own merits as well as dis-merits. Those are:<br />
-A really weak performance from Dominic Cooper. It dragged the entire movie down.<br />
-A spirited performance from Knightly but her character is ultimately unsympathetic. Cavorting and living the party-going life makes her look like an earlier version of Paris Hilton, rather than a genuine mould breaker.<br />
-Beautiful sets.<br />
-An excellent performance from Fiennes. It would have been all too easy to depict the Duke as a cartoon villian but his nuanced performance added depth.<br />
-Poor script. Some of the lines were desperately clunky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: faemom</title>
		<link>http://thefemspot.com/2008/10/11/no-sympathy-for-the-duchess-of-discontent/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[faemom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://femspotter.wordpress.com/?p=220#comment-72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent critic.  I haven&#039;t seen the movie yet, but I can&#039;t wait.  Ha, poor little rich girl.  Obviously someone doesn&#039;t know her history.  You nailed it with saying that we, here in the 21st century, wouldn&#039;t want to trade places with Georgiana.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent critic.  I haven&#8217;t seen the movie yet, but I can&#8217;t wait.  Ha, poor little rich girl.  Obviously someone doesn&#8217;t know her history.  You nailed it with saying that we, here in the 21st century, wouldn&#8217;t want to trade places with Georgiana.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

